Qwilr is one of the few proposal tools that actually gets design right. Interactive pages, embedded videos, beautiful layouts. If you are comparing it to Pitchsite, you clearly care about the impression your proposals make. Good. That is the right thing to care about.
We built Pitchsite, so we are biased. But this comparison is going to be honest about where Qwilr is stronger and where we think Pitchsite is the better choice for agencies specifically.
What Qwilr Does Well
Qwilr pioneered the idea of proposals as interactive web pages rather than static documents. Credit where it is due.
Qwilr's Strengths
- ✓ Beautiful interactive design. Qwilr proposals look like polished web pages. Embedded videos, interactive pricing quotes, and clean typography. They pioneered this format and still do it well.
- ✓ Drag-and-drop builder. The block-based editor gives you real control over layout and design. You can create genuinely unique-looking proposals without touching code.
- ✓ Accept and sign on the page. Clients can accept quotes and e-sign directly on the proposal page. No separate signing flow needed.
- ✓ CRM integrations. Works with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Zapier. Proposals can be auto-created from CRM deals, which is great for teams with established pipelines.
- ✓ Analytics and notifications. See when prospects open, how long they spend on each section, and get real-time notifications. Useful for timing follow-ups.
Where Qwilr Falls Short for Agencies
1. The Price is Hard to Justify
Qwilr starts at $35/user/month on their Business plan. For a 3-person agency, that is $105/month. Their Enterprise plan goes even higher. Compared to Pitchsite at $29/month flat (no per-user fees), the cost difference is significant, especially for smaller agencies where every dollar matters.
2. No AI Brief-to-Proposal Generation
Qwilr has added some AI writing features, but you still start from a blank page or template and build manually. You cannot paste a client brief and get a complete, structured proposal back. For agencies sending multiple proposals per week, this manual work adds up. AI should handle the scaffolding so you can focus on strategy.
3. No Built-in Site Audit Tool
For marketing and web agencies, including an audit of the prospect's current website in the proposal is a powerful sales tool. It shows you have done research and makes the proposal feel personalized. Qwilr has no audit capability. You need separate tools and manual screenshots.
4. Overkill for Smaller Agencies
Qwilr has built for enterprise sales teams and larger organizations. Features like CRM automations, team permissions hierarchies, and deal-room capabilities are powerful but unnecessary for a 2-5 person agency. You are paying for complexity you do not need.
5. Not Agency-Specific
Qwilr serves sales teams, consultants, and agencies. The templates and workflows are generic. There are no agency-specific features like service type templates (SEO proposals, web design proposals, PPC proposals) or agency pricing models built in.
Pricing: The Numbers That Matter
Price is one of the biggest reasons agencies are switching from Qwilr. Here is a direct comparison:
| Team Size | Qwilr Cost | Pitchsite Cost | Annual Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 person | $35/mo | $29/mo | $72/yr |
| 2 people | $70/mo | $29/mo | $492/yr |
| 3 people | $105/mo | $29/mo | $912/yr |
| 5 people | $175/mo | $29/mo | $1,752/yr |
| 10 people | $350/mo | $29/mo | $3,852/yr |
For a solo freelancer, the difference is marginal. But as soon as you add a second team member, Pitchsite's flat pricing becomes significantly cheaper. For a 5-person agency, that is over $1,750/year back in your pocket.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Qwilr | Pitchsite |
|---|---|---|
| Proposal format | Interactive web page | Full website |
| AI content generation | Basic writing help | Full (brief → proposal) |
| Site audit tool | ❌ | ✅ |
| Drag-and-drop builder | ✅ | AI-driven |
| Scroll animations | Limited | ✅ |
| Interactive pricing | ✅ | ✅ |
| View tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| E-signatures | ✅ | ❌ (coming) |
| CRM integrations | ✅ (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ❌ (planned) |
| Custom domains | ✅ (Enterprise only) | ✅ |
| Agency-specific features | Generic | Built for agencies |
| Free plan | ❌ (14-day trial) | ✅ (1 proposal) |
| Pricing | From $35/user/mo | $29/mo flat |
Qwilr is strong on design control, e-signatures, and CRM integrations. Pitchsite wins on AI generation, agency-specific features, pricing, and the overall proposal experience for agencies specifically.
Who Should Use Each
Choose Qwilr if you...
- • Want granular control over proposal design and layout
- • Need CRM integrations with Salesforce or HubSpot
- • Require built-in e-signatures on the proposal page
- • Are an enterprise sales team with a large budget
- • Value the drag-and-drop builder over AI-driven creation
Choose Pitchsite if you...
- • Want AI to generate proposals from a brief, not build from scratch
- • Need agency-specific features like site audits and service templates
- • Want flat pricing that does not penalize team growth
- • Sell marketing, web design, SEO, or creative services
- • Want scroll animations and a truly interactive web experience
- • Care about cost efficiency without sacrificing quality
How to Switch from Qwilr to Pitchsite
- 1. Keep Qwilr for active deals. Do not disrupt proposals already in front of prospects. Let them close on Qwilr.
- 2. Try Pitchsite on your next prospect. Use the free tier to create a proposal from a real brief. See how the AI-generated result compares to what you would have built manually in Qwilr.
- 3. Compare the experience. Show both versions to a colleague or trusted client. Ask which one is more impressive.
- 4. Track the numbers. After 5-10 proposals, compare close rates, time spent creating, and client feedback.
- 5. Cancel Qwilr when ready. Most agencies that try Pitchsite do not go back. The combination of AI speed, lower cost, and agency-specific features is hard to beat.
For more on what makes proposals convert, check out our complete agency proposal guide and the agency pricing calculator.
Free Tool: Website Audit
Audit any prospect's website and use the results as a cold outreach opener. Takes 30 seconds, no signup needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pitchsite cheaper than Qwilr?
Yes. Qwilr starts at $35/user/month. Pitchsite is $29/month flat, no per-user fees. For a 3-person team, that is $29/mo vs $105/mo. Pitchsite also has a free tier.
Does Pitchsite have a drag-and-drop builder like Qwilr?
Pitchsite takes a different approach. Instead of manual drag-and-drop, AI generates the complete proposal from your brief. You can then customize sections, content, and pricing. It is faster than building from scratch but gives you less pixel-level control than Qwilr's builder.
Can Pitchsite integrate with my CRM?
CRM integrations are planned but not live yet. Qwilr has an edge here with HubSpot and Salesforce integrations. If CRM integration is critical, Qwilr may be the better choice until Pitchsite adds this feature.
Which creates better-looking proposals?
Both create attractive, web-based proposals. Qwilr gives you more manual design control through its builder. Pitchsite proposals tend to feel more like a premium website with scroll animations and interactive elements. Try both and see which aesthetic your clients respond to better.