What Is Proposable?
Proposable is a cloud-based proposal software tool aimed at small to mid-size businesses and agencies. It allows teams to create, send, and track sales proposals with e-signature capability. Launched over a decade ago, Proposable was one of the earlier dedicated proposal tools on the market — before the current wave of interactive, analytics-first platforms emerged.
The platform includes a drag-and-drop proposal builder, a template library, basic open/view tracking, and built-in e-signatures. It integrates with common CRMs like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Zoho. Proposable's pricing is generally positioned as accessible — starting around $19–$39/month — which is a key reason smaller agencies have historically chosen it.
Proposable: At a Glance
Proposify published their own "Proposable alternatives" roundup in March 2026 — which tells you everything you need to know about where Proposable sits in the market right now. When a direct competitor is writing content targeting your name with "alternatives" attached, it's a signal that the market views you as a tool that agencies are actively looking to replace.
Why Agencies Look for Proposable Alternatives
Proposable served a real need when it launched, but the proposal software landscape has shifted dramatically. In 2026, agencies face a buyer who expects more: interactive proposals they can explore on any device, real-time pricing they can configure themselves, and proposal analytics that tell you exactly why a deal stalled or closed.
Here are the most common reasons agencies move on from Proposable:
Thin proposal analytics
Proposable gives you basic open tracking — you know when a prospect opened the proposal. But agency sales teams need more: which sections did they spend time on? Did they skip the pricing page? Did a second stakeholder view it? Tools like Pitchsite and Proposify offer heatmaps, engagement scores, and multi-viewer tracking that Proposable simply doesn't.
Outdated interactive pricing
Modern agencies need pricing tables where prospects can configure their own package — toggling add-ons, adjusting quantities, selecting tiers. Proposable's pricing tables are functional but lack the dynamic interactivity that newer tools offer, which can reduce the friction in the buying process.
Limited template quality and variety
Proposable's template library hasn't kept pace with agency design standards. In a world where proposals compete visually with polished web experiences, sending something that looks dated is a conversion killer.
No agency-specific tooling
Proposable is built for general business proposals. It doesn't have discovery-to-proposal workflows, agency-specific pricing models, or retainer conversion features. Tools built with agencies in mind will always serve agencies better.
Per-seat pricing model
As agencies grow, per-seat pricing compresses margins. Teams of 5–10 people find their monthly proposal software cost ballooning. Flat-rate or usage-based alternatives are increasingly attractive.
Top 5 Proposable Alternatives for Agencies
We evaluated each tool on four criteria: proposal analytics depth, interactive pricing capability, e-signature quality, and agency-specific templates and features. Here are the best alternatives to Proposable in 2026.
#1Pitchsite — Best for Agencies
Pitchsite is the only proposal platform designed exclusively for service-based agencies. Where Proposable takes a generalist approach, Pitchsite is purpose-built for the way agencies sell: discovery-led proposals, interactive pricing with retainer and project options, and analytics that show you exactly how engaged your prospect is — by section, by stakeholder, in real time.
- ✓Time-on-section heatmaps
- ✓Engagement score per prospect
- ✓Interactive pricing (toggle retainer/project)
- ✓Agency proposal templates library
- ✓Built-in e-signatures
- ✓Custom domain support
- ✓Free tier (no credit card)
- →Free plan: basic proposals
- →Pro: from $29/month
- →Agency: from $79/month (team)
- →No per-seat tax on growth
- ✗Newer to market than Proposify/PandaDoc
- ✗Fewer enterprise integrations
The clear best choice if you run or work in a service agency. The combination of agency-specific analytics, interactive pricing, and a free tier makes it the easiest win over Proposable. If you care about knowing why a proposal converts (or doesn't), nothing else on this list comes close.
See how Pitchsite compares to Proposable
Get 7 agency sales lessons + a free proposal template. No credit card needed.
#2Proposify
Proposify is the most direct Proposable competitor — both are proposal-first tools, and Proposify has consistently been rated higher on G2 and Capterra. Proposify offers a stronger analytics dashboard, more polished templates, and better team collaboration than Proposable. It's a genuine step up if you're migrating away from Proposable and want a similar category of tool with more horsepower.
- ✓Deep proposal analytics (open, time-on-page)
- ✓Large, modern template library
- ✓Interactive pricing tables
- ✓Strong e-sign and approval workflows
- ✗Expensive: $49–$65/user/month
- ✗Not agency-specific
- ✗No custom domain
- ✗Document-style (not fully web-native)
A solid upgrade over Proposable if you want a like-for-like replacement with better analytics and templates. The pricing jump is real though — expect to pay 2–3× more per seat. See our full Proposify vs PandaDoc comparison if you're deciding between these two.
#3PandaDoc
PandaDoc is a document automation platform — proposals are one of many document types it handles alongside contracts, NDAs, and HR documents. It's the broadest tool on this list. If your agency needs a single platform for all document workflows (not just proposals), PandaDoc is the strongest option. However, if you're exclusively optimising proposal win rates, its generalist approach means you'll leave agency-specific features on the table.
- ✓750+ integrations
- ✓Full document lifecycle (contracts, NDAs)
- ✓Powerful CPQ (configure-price-quote)
- ✓Lower starting price ($19/user/mo)
- ✗Not proposal-specific or agency-focused
- ✗Proposal analytics are basic vs. Proposify/Pitchsite
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can feel like overkill for proposal-only use
Best for agencies that need a full document management platform, not just proposals. If you spend significant time on contracts and NDAs alongside proposals, PandaDoc handles all of it in one place. Not the best pure-play proposal win-rate tool.
#4Qwilr
Qwilr is the design-forward option on this list. Instead of document-style proposals, Qwilr creates genuinely beautiful web pages that clients view in-browser. If visual impact and first impression are the highest priority for your agency's proposals, Qwilr is worth considering. It's a strong step up from Proposable on design. However, its analytics are shallower than Pitchsite or Proposify, and it's priced at $35/user/month.
- ✓Best-looking proposals of any tool
- ✓True web-based (not PDF-style)
- ✓E-signatures included
- ✓Good CRM integrations
- ✗Limited proposal analytics
- ✗Interactive pricing less powerful
- ✗No free plan
- ✗Less agency-specific than Pitchsite
Great if your primary concern is proposal aesthetics and making a visual impression. For analytics-first teams or agencies on a budget, look elsewhere.
#5Better Proposals
Better Proposals is the most Proposable-like tool on this list in terms of simplicity and price point. It offers web-based proposals, e-signatures, and basic analytics at $19/user/month. It's a solid choice for freelancers or very small agencies that want something cleaner than Proposable without a big price jump. The template library is reasonably modern and the UI is polished. Where it falls short is depth: analytics are limited, interactive pricing is basic, and there are no agency-specific features.
- ✓Simple, clean UI
- ✓Affordable pricing ($19/mo)
- ✓Web proposals (not PDF)
- ✓E-signatures and payments
- ✗Basic analytics
- ✗Limited interactive pricing
- ✗Not built for agencies
- ✗Small integration library
A lateral move from Proposable, not an upgrade. Fine for solo freelancers, but agencies that have outgrown Proposable will quickly hit the same ceilings here.
Feature Comparison Table
Here's a full head-to-head of the five alternatives vs. each other on the features that matter most to agencies. Note: Proposable is not included — this table shows what you're upgrading to, not from.
| Feature | Pitchsite | Proposify | PandaDoc | Qwilr | Better Props |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan | |||||
| Starting price (solo) | Free | $49/mo | $19/mo | $35/mo | $19/mo |
| E-signatures | |||||
| Interactive pricing tables | |||||
| Proposal analytics & tracking | |||||
| Time-on-section heatmaps | |||||
| Agency-specific templates | |||||
| AI content generation | |||||
| Web-based (not PDF) | |||||
| Custom domain | |||||
| CRM integrations | |||||
| Team collaboration | |||||
| Contract management | |||||
| Engagement score / alerts | |||||
| Built for agencies |
For a broader view of the whole proposal software market (including tools not covered here), see our full proposal software comparison. If you're trying to decide between the two biggest names in the space, our Proposify vs PandaDoc breakdown goes deep on every dimension.
Pricing Comparison
Pricing is one of the most common drivers of switching away from Proposable. Here's how the five alternatives stack up on price. All prices are monthly billed monthly; annual billing typically saves 15–20%.
| Tool | Free Plan? | Solo / Starter | Team (5 seats) | Pricing Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchsite ⭐ | Yes | Free–$29/mo | ~$79/mo flat | Flat-rate tiers |
| Proposify | No | $49/user/mo | $245+/mo | Per seat |
| PandaDoc | E-sign only | $19/user/mo | $95+/mo | Per seat |
| Qwilr | No | $35/user/mo | $175+/mo | Per seat |
| Better Proposals | No | $19/mo | $49/mo (3 users) | Tiered plans |
The per-seat trap: Proposify, PandaDoc, and Qwilr all use per-seat pricing. At 5 users, Proposify costs $245/month. Pitchsite's Agency plan covers the whole team for $79/month. Over 12 months, that's a $1,992 difference — enough for a solid link-building campaign or a junior hire.
Migrating Away from Proposable
Switching proposal tools feels more daunting than it is. Most agencies complete the migration in a week without disrupting their sales pipeline. Here's the straightforward process:
Before cancelling Proposable, download PDFs of all your signed proposals. These are your legal records. Store them in your shared drive organised by client and date.
You almost certainly reuse a handful of proposal structures. Identify these and note the key sections, content blocks, and pricing tables. This is your migration scope — rebuilding 3–5 templates is usually all you need.
Allow 1–2 hours per template for your first builds. Most agency owners are surprised at how quickly modern tools like Pitchsite let you build proposals — the drag-and-drop editors have improved dramatically. Use your new tool's template library as a starting point and adapt it.
Disconnect your Proposable CRM integration and reconnect with your new tool. Most CRMs have native integrations with Proposify, PandaDoc, and Pitchsite. If you use Zapier, update the relevant Zaps.
Don't test in a vacuum — send a live proposal for a real opportunity. This will surface any friction points before you fully switch. Most teams send their first live proposal within 2–3 days of starting migration.
Once you're set up in your new tool, the real value unlocks quickly. With Pitchsite, you'll see proposal analytics from the very first send — who opened it, which sections they read, and when they spent time on pricing. That data is immediately actionable in your follow-up. Check out our agency proposal guide for a complete walkthrough of what a high-converting agency proposal should include.
Free Tool: Website Audit
Audit any prospect's website and use the results as a cold outreach opener. Takes 30 seconds, no signup needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Proposable alternative for agencies?
Pitchsite is the best Proposable alternative for agencies. It offers agency-specific templates, deep proposal analytics including time-on-section heatmaps, interactive pricing tables, and built-in e-signatures. The free tier means you can test it without any commitment.
Why are agencies switching away from Proposable?
The most common reasons are limited proposal analytics (basic open tracking only), outdated template library, basic interactive pricing, and per-seat pricing that scales poorly for growing teams. Newer tools offer significantly more value at similar or lower price points.
How does Proposable compare to Proposify?
Proposify is a significant upgrade from Proposable — it offers deeper analytics, a larger and more modern template library, and stronger team collaboration. However, Proposify starts at $49/user/month compared to Proposable's ~$19/month, so the upgrade comes at a cost.
Does Proposable have a free plan?
No — Proposable offers a free trial but not a free plan. If you need a free proposal tool, Pitchsite has a free tier. PandaDoc has a free e-sign-only plan, though it's too limited for real proposal creation.
Which proposal software has the best analytics for agencies?
Pitchsite leads on agency-focused analytics with time-on-section heatmaps and engagement scores. Proposify is a close second with solid open/time-on-page data. PandaDoc, Qwilr, and Better Proposals all offer more basic tracking.
Can I migrate my proposals from Proposable to another tool?
Yes, and it's faster than most teams expect. Export your signed proposals as PDFs, then rebuild your top 3–5 templates in the new tool (1–2 hours each). Update CRM integrations and you're live. Most agencies complete the full migration in under a week.
Is Qwilr a good Proposable alternative?
Qwilr is the best-looking option on this list and creates genuinely web-native proposals. If visual design is your top priority, it's worth the $35/user/month. For analytics-first teams or budget-constrained agencies, Pitchsite delivers more value.
What makes Pitchsite different from other proposal tools?
Pitchsite is the only tool on this list built exclusively for service agencies. The templates, analytics, and pricing features are all designed around how agencies pitch and close clients — not generic document workflows. The engagement scoring and time-on-section data are specific to Pitchsite and have a direct impact on win rates.